chessflex

Title matches

Records

Every number is the ChessFlex coach's: a side's chances as it sees them, and what a move did to its own side's chances. Each blunder and missed win was checked again by a second, stronger engine before it went on this page.

The ten biggest blunders

Steinitz v Chigorin 1892, Game 23

Chigorin v Steinitz · 0–1

32. Bb4 by Chigorin: chances 81% → 0%

The coach: Rd7 instead (the arrow) — with it, Chigorin was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1892: Steinitz v Chigorin › Game 23

Tal v Botvinnik 1960, Game 17

Tal v Botvinnik · 1–0

39... Qd5 by Botvinnik: chances 76% → 3%

The coach: Ka8 instead (the arrow) — with it, Botvinnik was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1960: Tal v Botvinnik › Game 17

Steinitz v Chigorin 1892, Game 10

Steinitz v Chigorin · 0–1

30. g5 by Steinitz: chances 74% → 6%

The coach: Bxh6 instead (the arrow) — with it, Steinitz was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1892: Steinitz v Chigorin › Game 10

Karpov v Anand (FIDE) 1998, Game 2

Anand v Karpov · 1–0

34... h6 by Karpov: chances 86% → 34%

The coach: Ne2+ instead (the arrow) — with it, Karpov was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1998: Karpov v Anand (FIDE) › Game 2

Carlsen v Anand 2013, Game 9

Anand v Carlsen · 0–1

28. Nf1 by Anand: chances 62% → 10%

The coach: Bf1 instead (the arrow) — with it, Anand was a bit better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 2013: Carlsen v Anand › Game 9

Lasker v Schlechter 1910, Game 5

Schlechter v Lasker · 1–0

54... Qc5 by Lasker: chances 76% → 25%

The coach: c3 instead (the arrow) — with it, Lasker was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1910: Lasker v Schlechter › Game 5

Lasker v Tarrasch 1908, Game 14

Tarrasch v Lasker · ½–½

119... Kh4 by Lasker: chances 50% → 0%

The coach: Rb1 instead (the arrow) — with it, it was about level.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1908: Lasker v Tarrasch › Game 14

Smyslov v Botvinnik 1957, Game 9

Botvinnik v Smyslov · ½–½

34. Qd8+ by Botvinnik: chances 100% → 50%

The coach: Qd4+ instead (the arrow) — with it, Botvinnik was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1957: Smyslov v Botvinnik › Game 9

Karpov v Korchnoi 1978, Game 17

Korchnoi v Karpov · 0–1

39. Ra1 by Korchnoi: chances 50% → 0%

The coach: g3 instead (the arrow) — with it, it was about level.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1978: Karpov v Korchnoi › Game 17

Kasparov v Karpov 1985, Game 24

Karpov v Kasparov · 0–1

40. e5 by Karpov: chances 51% → 1%

The coach: g6 instead (the arrow) — with it, it was about level.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1985: Kasparov v Karpov › Game 24

Wins that got away

A player the coach gave 85% or more, who didn't win. The move shown is the one that let it go.

Smyslov v Botvinnik 1957, Game 9

Botvinnik v Smyslov · ½–½

34. Qd8+ by Botvinnik: chances 100% → 50%

The coach: Qd4+ instead (the arrow) — with it, Botvinnik was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1957: Smyslov v Botvinnik › Game 9

Botvinnik v Smyslov 1958, Game 18

Botvinnik v Smyslov · 1–0

26... Rde8 by Smyslov: chances 99% → 63%

The coach: Rd2 instead (the arrow) — with it, Smyslov was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1958: Botvinnik v Smyslov › Game 18

Kramnik v Kasparov 2000, Game 4

Kramnik v Kasparov · ½–½

59. Kb2 by Kramnik: chances 98% → 97%

The coach: Rg8 instead (the arrow) — with it, Kramnik was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 2000: Kramnik v Kasparov › Game 4

Karpov v Timman (FIDE) 1993, Game 12

Karpov v Timman · ½–½

46. Bc4 by Karpov: chances 97% → 53%

The coach: Be8 instead (the arrow) — with it, Karpov was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1993: Karpov v Timman (FIDE) › Game 12

Botvinnik v Bronstein 1951, Game 16

Bronstein v Botvinnik · ½–½

72... Rxg3+ by Botvinnik: chances 80% → 50%

The coach: Rxd4 instead (the arrow) — with it, Botvinnik was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1951: Botvinnik v Bronstein › Game 16

Karpov v Korchnoi 1978, Game 20

Karpov v Korchnoi · ½–½

55. Rxh4 by Karpov: chances 84% → 63%

The coach: Rd4 instead (the arrow) — with it, Karpov was clearly better.

Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 1978: Karpov v Korchnoi › Game 20

The wildest games

How far the chances swung, all game long.

  1. Karpov v Korchnoi 1978, Game 5 Korchnoi v Karpov · ½–½ · 123 moves · swing 6.5
  2. Carlsen v Nepomniachtchi 2021, Game 6 Carlsen v Nepomniachtchi · 1–0 · 135 moves · swing 6.5
  3. Steinitz v Chigorin 1892, Game 15 Chigorin v Steinitz · 1–0 · 46 moves · swing 6.5
  4. Botvinnik v Tal 1961, Game 20 Tal v Botvinnik · ½–½ · 121 moves · swing 6.4
  5. Lasker v Steinitz 1894, Game 6 Steinitz v Lasker · ½–½ · 71 moves · swing 6.3
  6. Ding v Nepomniachtchi 2023, Game 14 Ding v Nepomniachtchi · ½–½ · 90 moves · swing 6.3
  7. Kramnik v Topalov 2006, Game 2 Topalov v Kramnik · 0–1 · 63 moves · swing 5.8
  8. Carlsen v Karjakin 2016, Game 4 Karjakin v Carlsen · ½–½ · 93 moves · swing 5.7
  9. Alekhine v Bogoljubov 1929, Game 23 Alekhine v Bogoljubov · ½–½ · 82 moves · swing 5.6
  10. Steinitz v Chigorin 1889, Game 13 Chigorin v Steinitz · 1–0 · 63 moves · swing 5.4

The cleanest games

Both players' accuracy, the lower of the two first; 30 moves or more.

  1. Carlsen v Anand 2013, Game 8 Carlsen v Anand · ½–½ · 97.3 / 97.1
  2. Smyslov v Botvinnik 1957, Game 3 Botvinnik v Smyslov · ½–½ · 97.0 / 97.3
  3. Lasker v Schlechter 1910, Game 3 Schlechter v Lasker · ½–½ · 96.3 / 96.8
  4. Gukesh v Ding 2024, Game 4 Ding v Gukesh · ½–½ · 96.0 / 96.7
  5. Petrosian v Spassky 1966, Game 1 Spassky v Petrosian · ½–½ · 95.9 / 96.1
  6. Kramnik v Topalov 2006, Game 12 Kramnik v Topalov · ½–½ · 96.1 / 95.9
  7. Anand v Gelfand 2012, Game 4 Gelfand v Anand · ½–½ · 95.8 / 95.7
  8. Kasparov v Karpov 1985, Game 20 Karpov v Kasparov · ½–½ · 95.6 / 95.6
  9. Kasparov v Karpov 1986, Game 3 Karpov v Kasparov · ½–½ · 95.7 / 95.6
  10. Spassky v Petrosian 1969, Game 6 Petrosian v Spassky · ½–½ · 95.5 / 95.6

The longest games

  1. Carlsen v Nepomniachtchi 2021, Game 6 Carlsen v Nepomniachtchi · 1–0 · 136 moves
  2. Karpov v Korchnoi 1978, Game 5 Korchnoi v Karpov · ½–½ · 124 moves
  3. Carlsen v Anand 2014, Game 7 Carlsen v Anand · ½–½ · 122 moves
  4. Botvinnik v Tal 1961, Game 20 Tal v Botvinnik · ½–½ · 121 moves
  5. Lasker v Tarrasch 1908, Game 14 Tarrasch v Lasker · ½–½ · 119 moves

The shortest wins

  1. Anand v Gelfand 2012, Game 8 Anand v Gelfand · 1–0 · 17 moves
  2. Steinitz v Zukertort 1886, Game 20 Steinitz v Zukertort · 1–0 · 19 moves
  3. Steinitz v Gunsberg 1890, Game 16 Gunsberg v Steinitz · 1–0 · 21 moves
  4. Lasker v Marshall 1907, Game 14 Lasker v Marshall · 1–0 · 21 moves
  5. Steinitz v Chigorin 1889, Game 4 Steinitz v Chigorin · 1–0 · 22 moves

Find your own blunders, before your opponent does

In ChessFlex the coach reviews every game you play, finds the move that mattered and replays it with you, in your language.

In the app: Play › any bot › after the game: Coach this game

Part of Study in ChessFlex: one purchase unlocks the coach, Follow a live game and all 53 title matches (on iPhone, try Study free first). Playing the bots is free, with no account and no ads.

How to study the champions with the coach →