Gukesh v Ding 2024, Game 14
Ding v Gukesh · 0–1
55. Rf2 by Ding: chances 27% → 6%
The coach: Bg2 instead (the arrow) — with it, Ding was under pressure.
Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 2024: Gukesh v Ding › Game 14
A lesson in probability, told with chess. What does it mean to give a player 30%? How much is one game worth? How well did the crowd read Game 14 in 2024? This page is about understanding chances, not about betting: ChessFlex takes no bets and links to no one who does.
Model (October ratings) Kalshi Polymarket
Gukesh's chance of winning the 2026 match, 19 October 2026. The markets (dashed) since the Candidates ended in April; the model (solid) from the October rating list. The model gives Gukesh 4 points more than the two markets' average (28%).
Why they can differ: the model sees only the two ratings and how title matches have gone; traders can weigh form (Gukesh has slipped from 2794 to 2710 since 2024), preparation, nerves and anything else they believe. Neither is "right" before the match; the useful question is what each one knows. Both will be updated after every game.
The coach gives each side a chance from its evaluation of the position, and the app shows it by each player's name. Here is what title-match positions at each chance for White actually ended as, 76,761 positions in all (light: White won, amber: drawn, dark: Black won), in the middlegame (moves 25–45) and in the ending (after move 45).
The same edge is worth less in an ending. At 60–69%, White went on to win 46% of middlegames but only 31% of endings; 68% of those endings were drawn. Endings are where draws live, and champions defend.
Ding and Gukesh were level at 6½ each, in a rook-and-bishop ending most people expected to be drawn. On move 55 Ding played Rf2, and the title went with it.
The coach: Gukesh's chances (Black), move by move
Gukesh wins game 14 Draw Ding wins
Polymarket's traders, by the clock in Singapore (their public trade feed): before the blunder, a draw at about 97% and Gukesh near 2–3%; minutes later, Gukesh above 99%.
Two readings of one position. The coach saw Black better, about 71% around move 50, and in title-match endings at that kind of edge the better side went on to win 53% of the time. The crowd knew this particular ending as a well-known draw, and it held for nearly four hours. Neither number was wrong; they answer different questions. One move turned the position into a lost one, and both readings changed at once.
Ding v Gukesh · 0–1
55. Rf2 by Ding: chances 27% → 6%
The coach: Bg2 instead (the arrow) — with it, Ding was under pressure.
Replay it: Study › Follow a live game › World Championship 2024: Gukesh v Ding › Game 14
A simple model, in the open: each game from the two ratings, a White edge and a draw rate, fitted on 456 rated title-match games since 1972; while a game is on, from what positions like it actually ended as (above). The surprise in the fit: a rating gap counts for only about 35% of its size in a title match.
Model: Gukesh's chance of winning the match Polymarket: Gukesh to win (after each game)
Polymarket's price after each game (its daily price history) against the model, which never saw it. Before the match the crowd was surer of Gukesh than the model, 78% to 65%. After Ding won game 1, 55% and 43%. After Gukesh won game 11, 82% and 85%; after Ding hit back in game 12, 50% and 56%. Going into the last game, close to a coin toss for both.
Model: Ding's chance of winning the match
Model: Carlsen's chance of winning the match
Model: Carlsen's chance of winning the match
Model: Carlsen's chance of winning the match
Model: Carlsen's chance of winning the match
Model: Carlsen's chance of winning the match
Model: Anand's chance of winning the match
Model: Anand's chance of winning the match
Model: Anand's chance of winning the match
Model: Kramnik's chance of winning the match
The model gives Gukesh about 31% to keep the title, from the ratings alone. On Kalshi, a regulated US prediction market, Gukesh traded at about 28% and Sindarov 72% on 19 October 2026 (bid–ask midpoint). Two very different methods, nearly the same answer. We'll update both after every game.
Prices are quoted for information, with their source; nothing here is advice. Real-money betting and prediction markets are not legal everywhere, India included.
In ChessFlex, Predict the moves: guess each move of a live game before it's played, for points, never money. Three for the exact move, one for a move as good as the engine's.
In the app: Study › Follow a live game › any game › Predict the moves
Part of Study in ChessFlex: one purchase unlocks the coach, Follow a live game and all 53 title matches (on iPhone, try Study free first). Playing the bots is free, with no account and no ads.